Search for: "Benq Corporation"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2010, 1:22 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as respondents in this investigation: Qisda Corporation of Taiwan Qisda America Corporation of Irvine, California Qisda (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. of China BenQ Corporation of Taiwan BenQ America Corporation of Irvine, California BenQ Latin America Corporation of Miami, Florida AU Optronics Corporation of Taiwan AU Optronics… [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:58 pm
The Respondents in this investigation are: Chimei Innolux Corporation, Innolux Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., MStar Semiconductor, Inc., Qisda Corporation, Qisda American Corporation, Qisda (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., BenQ Corporation, BenQ America Corp., BenQ Latin America, and Realtek Semiconductor Corporation. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 4:33 pm
The complaint alleges that Qisda Corporation of Taiwan, Qisda America Corporation of Irvine, California, Qisda (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. of China (collectively, “Qisda”), BenQ Corporation of Taiwan, BenQ America Corporation of Irvine, California, BenQ Latin America Corporation of Miami, Florida (collectively, “BenQ”), AU Optronics Corporation of Taiwan, and AU Optronics Corporation… [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm
(collectively “Acer”), BenQ America Corp. and BenQ Corp. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 6:40 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as respondents in this investigation: Chimei Innolux Corporation of Taiwan Innolux Corporation of Austin, Texas Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc. of San Jose, California MStar Semiconductor, Inc. of Taiwan Qisda Corporation of Taiwan Qisda American Corporation of Irvine, California Qisda (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. of China BenQ Corporation of Taiwan BenQ… [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 2:14 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as the respondents in this investigation: AU Optronics Corp. of Taiwan AU Optronics Corporation America of Houston, Texas Acer America Corporation of San Jose, California Acer Inc. of Taiwan BenQ America Corp. of Irvine, California BenQ Corp. of Taiwan SANYO Electric Co., Ltd. of Japan SANYO North America Corporation of San Diego, California [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 8:42 am
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as respondents in this investigation: AU Optronics Corp. of Taiwan AU Optronics Corporation America of Houston, Texas BenQ America Corp. of Irvine, California BenQ Corporation of Taiwan Haier America Trading LLC of New York, New York Haier Group Company of China LG Electronics Inc. of Korea LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey SANYO Electric Co., Ltd. of… [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 11:27 am
Patent Nos. 6,879,364 (the ‘364 patent), 7,304,626 (the ‘626 patent), 7,532,183 (the ‘183 patent), 7,283,192 (the ‘192 patent), 6,937,300 (the ‘300 patent), 7,057,689 (the ‘689 patent), and 7,838,881 (the ‘881 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”) or are manufactured using a process covered by the asserted patents: AU Optronics Corp. of Taiwan AU Optronics Corporation America of Houston, Texas BenQ America Corp. of… [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 7:22 am
United States case on a similar classification issue: In this action, Plaintiff BenQ America Corporation challenges the decision of the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection denying BenQ’s protest concerning the tariff classification of certain liquid crystal display (“LCD”) monitors imported from the People’s Republic of China in mid-May 2004. ... [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 7:27 pm
The complaint alleges that AU Optronics Corp. of Taiwan and AU Optronics Corporation America of Houston, Texas (collectively, “AUO”), Acer America Corporation of San Jose, California, Acer Inc. of Taiwan, BenQ America Corp. of Irvine, California, BenQ Corp. of Taiwan, SANYO Electric Co., Ltd. of Japan, and SANYO North America Corporation of San Diego, California (all collectively, the “Proposed Respondents”) unlawfully import into… [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 8:13 pm
Ltd. of China, Kingston Technology Far East Co. of Taiwan, Kingston Technology Far East (Malaysia) of Malaysia, MiTAC Digital Corporation (aka Magellan) of Santa Clara, California, MiTAC International Corporation of Taiwan, Nokia Corp. of Finland, Nokia Inc. of Irving, Texas, PNY Technologies, Inc. of Parsippany, New Jersey, Research In Motion Ltd. of Canada, Research in Motion Corporation of Irving, Texas, Sirius XM Radio, Inc. of New York, New York, Transcend Information… [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP) Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP) Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark) Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46) Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in high-stake patent… [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
